The downfall of having a shower down the hall: you forget all the brilliance by the time you get back to your room after your shower…. Gonna try anyway.
Rereading Romeo and Juliet for seminar prep for Thursday--
Was it love or was it madness??
I think its true that all love is madness. Without getting into the attempts to define things that are undefinable i.e. love, I think that being willing and actually changing your world and your life for someone or something… that’s crazy; that’s madness.
All love is madness, but not all madness is love.
So were these just two horny kids, in the peak of their rebellious state? This would seem logical until the part where they decide that death is their best option… or were they really just in too deep and are a prime example of taking “go big or go home” to the ultimate level?
I’m a realist, but I’m also a hopeless romantic, and yes, sometimes it's hard to be both, but like any other piece or art or work, or anything at all in this world, this piece is up for personal interpretation… personally- I think it was love, maybe fueled by hormones and passion and lust, but at the end of the day, if all you have in your life is one person and you would willingly take your life rather than live without them… I don’t care if some people call that madness or desperation, I call it crazy and devotion and love.
This somehow led to brainstorming paper topics--
LOVE—
Love as a commodity. It has been processed and reprocessed and adjusted to fit every situation and circumstance imaginable.
So what of my own consumption of books, media, movies, etc… what about my consumption of love stories??
They dictate my life, but in their reproduction, was there ever an authenticity? And if there was, does it get lost through reproduction, like Barthes suggested with art and aura and status?
Were they once true? Did people really fall in love in these majestic magical, breathtaking ways? Or was this just the tale of some sad housewife wishing for what she had never had as she tucked her children in to sleep at night?
And does it matter? Aren't we soo deep in this fallacy that this type of sweep-you-off-your-feet love exists that it wouldn’t matter if there was documentation found somehow that all these famous love stories were fiction. It wouldn’t even matter to a lot of people, albeit mostly women.
----
ADDITION—10/26/09
What about my own love story? When I had/have the guy… the one throwing rocks at my window, saying super cute things, I blow it off as too cliché and therefore not real. It must be fabricated because things like that don’t happen in real life. Am I being stupid? Am I seriously wanting everything in these books and movies to happen and then rejecting them as insincere when they do???
What kind of girl gets rid of the guy who leaves a hand-dyed home-grown blue rose on her car in the morning before school??
A jaded one.
The stories and knowing how reproduced and unrealistic and unlikely they are to happen/be real… that knowledge is making me reject my chance to be the exception and actually have a guy do those things for me. It’s like my intelligence and study of these fabrications and depictions of love through the eye of the media is not enabling me to live a life that accepts these grand gestures as pure.
Maybe this is good- a safety net so my heart won’t break.
But what if these guys are doing these things because they think they’re supposed to; because that’s the way you’re supposed to let the girl know that she’s all you want and that you love her.
They do it because it’s in the books and movies; I reject it because it’s in the books and movies and those have lost their authenticity… when in reality, their authenticity is being reproduced and recreated right in front of me… if only I would let it be.
Taking cues from the media-
But the media isn’t real life… how do we know what is imitation because they think they’re supposed to do it because guys on tv do, or imitation because they think that’s how girls expect love to be expressed??
Blah.
----
Best friends-
I used to not believe in putting titles on things-
It's not that I like using someone else’s predefined definition of things to supposedly neatly fit exactly into my life, I still don’t, but now, it just doesn’t seem to be as big of a deal.
Some may call it maturity, but I’m just lazy.
Is that it then? It’s not that we stop believing in the things we used to fight for and strike for and rally for when we were younger, it’s just that as we get older, we just don’t have the energy anymore?
We’d rather use our energy for things that society deems worthy i.e. things that will make us money. Are we really that jaded?
Is it an economic decision, simply inevitable, or are we confusing maturity with lazy?
